Somchai Wongsawat, current PM of Thailand, could well be given his marching orders only 2 weeks after getting the job as PM.
Senator Ruangkrai Leekijwatana, who is filing a complaint to the
Electoral Commission, was also the guy responsible for toppling previous PM
Samak with a similar legal challenge.
His complaint centres on Somchai's ownership of 100,000 shares (worth 368,000 baht) in a listed telecomms company, CS Loxinfo, which does business with state enterprises throughout Thailand.
Thailand's Constitution prohibits members of Parliament from holding shares in companies that do business with state enterprises. If the Electoral Commission agrees with Mr. Ruangkrai and the complaint is upheld, this will then pass to the Constitutional Court who will quickly bring about a trial.
The legal case filed by Mr. Ruangkrai, if successful, could be drawn out over several months, and if found guilty by the Constitutional Court, Somchai would be disqualified as a member of Parliament, and therefore 'booted'.
While interesting, it is astonishing to see how easily ministers can get into hot water over seemingly trivial issues. 368,000 baht's worth of shares (less than 6k) in a telecommunications company? Hardly enough to class somebody as corrupt, is it?
Much of this stems from the re-writing of Thailand's Constitution by the military junta in 2007 brought about in the wake of the Thaksin premiership. Many proclaim the charter was designed solely to protect the interests of Thailand's elite, and perhaps there are strong foundations to agree with this.
Having said that, many Thai's support the Constitution, stating that it is clear, and needs to be tough in order to combat Thailand's never ending fight with corruption. The Constitution does seem very effective in keeping those in power on their toes, with even the slightest wrong doing potentially leading to swift penalties and possible removal of the accused member of parliament.
I wonder how this type of strict Constitution would translate to British politics? The job of judge, jury and executioner in our system seems to be in the hands of the media rather than formal institutions as in Thailand.
Thailand's political problems are intrinsic, those in power and those vying for power are first and foremost concerned for themselves, rather than those they are supposed to be serving.
Sound familiar?

(That's right Sam, two years!)
As we were walking in the procession, I heard several very loud, very close gunshots from somewhere in the compound. For a moment it sounded as though we were walking straight towards a shoot out more fitting to Tijuana than Thailand. I thought it must be fireworks, but as we turned the corner I saw three guys happily blasting away at the sky. 














